User talk:Oerjan

From Esolang

Thanks for you changes to Glass (and many other nodes!), the reorganization is quite nice :) --GregorR 19:36, 12 Jun 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome! I wondered what you thought about my replacing pointers by names, I thought it seemed more intuitive given the context-sensitivity. Also whether I got anything wrong about how the language works.

Next time I do a major edit by pasting into vim, I'll have to remember to :set paste to avoid inserting line breaks. The diffs got all messed up, and I just discovered the author link was broken. --Ørjan 20:04, 12 Jun 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for sorting out a page for me. It's quite generous of you. --Thematrixeatsyou 06:33, 1 Aug 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for creating the numerous Deadfish implementations. --Jonskinner

[edit] Template:License problem

Oerjan, you are a fine, fine, person, and I appreciate your contributions to this wiki, so don't take this personally. But Template:License problem is just silly. If someone posts copyrighted material here, we need to delete it ASAP, not keep it around and put it on display! We can re-add it if the author agrees, of course. I would've thought that was obvious. Maybe you have a good reason for this template, one that hasn't occurred to me -- if so, please say it here. I'll leave the template around for now just in case. --Graue 05:08, 3 Aug 2006 (UTC)

You are probably right, and besides you obviously have final say in this wiki's policy. What made me do this was that the person who entered the material seemed to be the copyright holder, so I thought it was less urgent than usual, and I got the idea of making a warning first. --Ørjan 19:59, 3 Aug 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Who's the anal-retentive one?

OK, now seeing as I have made a CPU architecture, someone may just steal it (grrr chinese) and use it in their CPU... "Ooooh, I can't be fucked making an arch, I'll just steal this poor guy's one." Now, compared against public domain...

• It has one catch: you must include that quote if you wish to redistribute it.

That is my one right. 191 bytes. It's like public domain in these ways (with slight exceptions):

• You can distribute it, modify it, make deriative works with it (with the condition in this case).
• You can slap another license on it. (Just keep that license with it.)
• You can piss on it, stick it in a blender, call it something else. (It just needs that quote)

The one thing you can't do is claim that it's yours. Well you can try, but have a look at the license, and you'll see why it can't be done practically.

I would call it "named public domain." And yet, you didn't do anything with my other langs. What the fuck?! You'd even fuck over an article that had a Creative Commons SA license (FYI: that is "no rights except the fact that it must stay no rights") or a green copyright (the copyright owner has released all rights).

My opinion: One goat.

--GreaseMonkey 01:27, 28 Nov 2006 (UTC)

It has been decided that the contents of this wiki should be public domain. You are certainly within your right to use a different license, but then please put it on a separate web site and link to it instead. --Rune 11:49, 28 Nov 2006 (UTC)

Well, I did give a warning once (see the Template discussion above), and then Graue thought I was silly and should have deleted it outright, so this time I did. Sorry for infuriating you, but this is site policy, and if we didn't have a common license the site might turn into (even more of) a mess. We can't please everybody all the time. And of course I am anal-retentive, I am a nerd you know. :) --Ørjan 02:17, 29 Nov 2006 (UTC)

I did just wanna thank you for your edit of FRAK--Sigfb05 21:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] For he's a jolly good fellow

Thanks Oerjan for correcting the typos in the ACRONYM spec, having broken and dislocated my fifth finger (no, really), it would have been excruciatingly painful for me to fix them (no, really) :) -- Hiato 14:53, 25 January 2008 (UTC)